Model Granary from the Tomb of Meketre

Middle KingdomDynasty 12reign of Amenemhat I, earlyca. 1981–1975 B.C.Egypt, Upper Egypt; Thebes, Southern Asasif, Tomb of Meketre (TT 280, MMA 1101), serdab, MMA 1920Wood, plaster, paint, linen, grain
This model of a granary was discovered in a hidden chamber at the side of the passage leading into the rock cut tomb of the royal chief steward Meketre, who began his career under King Nebhepetre Mentuhotep II of Dynasty 11 and continued to serve successive kings into the early years of Dynasty 12.
The four corners of this model granary are peaked in a manner that is sometimes still found in southern Egypt today presumably to offer additional protection against thieves and rodents. The interior is divided into two main sections: the granary proper, where grain was stored, and an accounting area. Keeping track of grain supplies was crucial in an agricultural society, and it is noteworthy that the six men carrying sacks of grain here are outnumbered by nine men taking care of measuring and accounting. Of the four scribes two are using papyrus scrolls, two write on wooden writing boards.
All the accessible rooms in the tomb of Meketre had been robbed and plundered already during Antiquity; but early in 1920 the Museum’s excavator Herbert Winlock wanted to obtain an accurate floor plan of the tomb’s lay out for his map of the Eleventh Dynasty necropolis at Thebes and, therefore, had his workmen clean out the accumulated debris. It was during this cleaning operation that the small hidden chamber was discovered filled with twenty four almost perfectly preserved models. Eventually, half of these went to the Egyptian Museum, Cairo, the other half to the Metropolitan Museum in the partition of finds.
All info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art, photo by Brass Ivy Design.

Model Granary from the Tomb of Meketre

Middle Kingdom
Dynasty 12
reign of Amenemhat I, early
ca. 1981–1975 B.C.
Egypt, Upper Egypt; Thebes, Southern Asasif, Tomb of Meketre (TT 280, MMA 1101), serdab, MMA 1920
Wood, plaster, paint, linen, grain

This model of a granary was discovered in a hidden chamber at the side of the passage leading into the rock cut tomb of the royal chief steward Meketre, who began his career under King Nebhepetre Mentuhotep II of Dynasty 11 and continued to serve successive kings into the early years of Dynasty 12.

The four corners of this model granary are peaked in a manner that is sometimes still found in southern Egypt today presumably to offer additional protection against thieves and rodents. The interior is divided into two main sections: the granary proper, where grain was stored, and an accounting area. Keeping track of grain supplies was crucial in an agricultural society, and it is noteworthy that the six men carrying sacks of grain here are outnumbered by nine men taking care of measuring and accounting. Of the four scribes two are using papyrus scrolls, two write on wooden writing boards.

All the accessible rooms in the tomb of Meketre had been robbed and plundered already during Antiquity; but early in 1920 the Museum’s excavator Herbert Winlock wanted to obtain an accurate floor plan of the tomb’s lay out for his map of the Eleventh Dynasty necropolis at Thebes and, therefore, had his workmen clean out the accumulated debris. It was during this cleaning operation that the small hidden chamber was discovered filled with twenty four almost perfectly preserved models. Eventually, half of these went to the Egyptian Museum, Cairo, the other half to the Metropolitan Museum in the partition of finds.

All info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art, photo by Brass Ivy Design.


Fragment of the Face of a Queen

New Kingdom, Amarna PeriodDynasty 18reign of Akhenatenca. 1353–1336 B.C.Egypt, Middle Egypt, probably el-Amarna (Akhetaten)Yellow jasper
This striking fragment is from a statue composed of different materials. The back of the piece shows remains of the mortise that fitted onto a tenon extending from the statue’s body, which may have been made of Egyptian alabaster to represent a white garment. Two headdresses might have fit this head: the khat-headdress, or the Nubian wig (as seen on the canopic jar lid, 30.8.54, in the same gallery).
The royal woman represented here cannot be securely identified. It is difficult to imagine that the already aged Queen Tiye—the mother of Akhenaten and highly respected as a wise woman at Amarna—was shown as a beauty of such sensuous character. Queens Nefertiti and Kiya, however, are both possible subjects.
All info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art, photo by Brass Ivy Design.

Fragment of the Face of a Queen

New Kingdom, Amarna Period
Dynasty 18
reign of Akhenaten
ca. 1353–1336 B.C.
Egypt, Middle Egypt, probably el-Amarna (Akhetaten)
Yellow jasper

This striking fragment is from a statue composed of different materials. The back of the piece shows remains of the mortise that fitted onto a tenon extending from the statue’s body, which may have been made of Egyptian alabaster to represent a white garment. Two headdresses might have fit this head: the khat-headdress, or the Nubian wig (as seen on the canopic jar lid, 30.8.54, in the same gallery).

The royal woman represented here cannot be securely identified. It is difficult to imagine that the already aged Queen Tiye—the mother of Akhenaten and highly respected as a wise woman at Amarna—was shown as a beauty of such sensuous character. Queens Nefertiti and Kiya, however, are both possible subjects.

All info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art, photo by Brass Ivy Design.


Detail of Statue of Gudea

Neo-Sumerianca. 2090 B.C.Mesopotamia, probably from Girsu (modern Tello)Diorite
The Akkadian Empire collapsed after two centuries of rule, and during the succeeding fifty years, local kings ruled independent city-states in southern Mesopotamia. The city-state of Lagash produced a remarkable number of statues of its kings as well as Sumerian literary hymns and prayers under the rule of Gudea (ca. 2150–2125 B.C.) and his son Ur-Ningirsu (ca. 2125–2100 B.C.). Unlike the art of the Akkadian period, which was characterized by dynamic naturalism, the works produced by this Neo-Sumerian culture are pervaded by a sense of pious reserve and serenity.
This sculpture belongs to a series of diorite statues commissioned by Gudea, who devoted his energies to rebuilding the great temples of Lagash and installing statues of himself in them. Many inscribed with his name and divine dedications survive. Here, Gudea is depicted in the seated pose of a ruler before his subjects, his hands folded in a traditional gesture of greeting and prayer. The Sumerian inscription on his robe lists the various temples that he built or renovated in Lagash and names the statue itself, “Gudea, the man who built the temple; may his life be long.”
All info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Photo by Brass Ivy Design

Detail of Statue of Gudea

Neo-Sumerian
ca. 2090 B.C.
Mesopotamia, probably from Girsu (modern Tello)
Diorite

The Akkadian Empire collapsed after two centuries of rule, and during the succeeding fifty years, local kings ruled independent city-states in southern Mesopotamia. The city-state of Lagash produced a remarkable number of statues of its kings as well as Sumerian literary hymns and prayers under the rule of Gudea (ca. 2150–2125 B.C.) and his son Ur-Ningirsu (ca. 2125–2100 B.C.). Unlike the art of the Akkadian period, which was characterized by dynamic naturalism, the works produced by this Neo-Sumerian culture are pervaded by a sense of pious reserve and serenity.

This sculpture belongs to a series of diorite statues commissioned by Gudea, who devoted his energies to rebuilding the great temples of Lagash and installing statues of himself in them. Many inscribed with his name and divine dedications survive. Here, Gudea is depicted in the seated pose of a ruler before his subjects, his hands folded in a traditional gesture of greeting and prayer. The Sumerian inscription on his robe lists the various temples that he built or renovated in Lagash and names the statue itself, “Gudea, the man who built the temple; may his life be long.”

All info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Photo by Brass Ivy Design


Detail of Human-headed winged bull and winged lion (lamassu)

ca. 883–859 B.C.Mesopotamia, Nimrud (ancient Kalhu)AssyrianGypsum alabaster
From the ninth to the seventh century B.C., the kings of Assyria ruled over a vast empire centered in northern Iraq. The great Assyrian king Ashurnasirpal II (r. 883–859 B.C.) undertook a vast building program at Nimrud, ancient Kalhu. Until it became the capital city under Ashurnasirpal, Nimrud had been no more than a provincial town.
The new capital occupied an area of about nine hundred acres, around which Ashurnasirpal constructed a mudbrick wall that was 120 feet thick, 42 feet high, and five miles long. In the southwest corner of this enclosure was the acropolis, where the temples, palaces, and administrative offices of the empire were located. In 879 B.C. Ashurnasirpal held a festival for 69,574 people to celebrate the construction of the new capital, and the event was documented by an inscription that read: “…the happy people of all the lands together with the people of Kalhu—for ten days I feasted, wined, bathed, and honored them and sent them back to their home in peace and joy.”
The so-called Standard Inscription that ran across the surface of most of the reliefs described Ashurnasirpal’s palace: “I built thereon [a palace with] halls of cedar, cypress, juniper, boxwood, teak, terebinth, and tamarisk [?] as my royal dwelling and for the enduring leisure life of my lordship.” The inscription continues: “Beasts of the mountains and the seas, which I had fashioned out of white limestone and alabaster, I had set up in its gates. I made it [the palace] fittingly imposing.” Such limestone beasts are the human-headed, winged bull and lion pictured here. The horned cap attests to their divinity, and the belt signifies their power. The sculptor gave these guardian figures five legs so that they appear to be standing firmly when viewed from the front but striding forward when seen from the side. These lamassu protected and supported important doorways in Assyrian palaces.
All info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Photo by Brass Ivy Design.

Detail of Human-headed winged bull and winged lion (lamassu)

ca. 883–859 B.C.
Mesopotamia, Nimrud (ancient Kalhu)
Assyrian
Gypsum alabaster

From the ninth to the seventh century B.C., the kings of Assyria ruled over a vast empire centered in northern Iraq. The great Assyrian king Ashurnasirpal II (r. 883–859 B.C.) undertook a vast building program at Nimrud, ancient Kalhu. Until it became the capital city under Ashurnasirpal, Nimrud had been no more than a provincial town.

The new capital occupied an area of about nine hundred acres, around which Ashurnasirpal constructed a mudbrick wall that was 120 feet thick, 42 feet high, and five miles long. In the southwest corner of this enclosure was the acropolis, where the temples, palaces, and administrative offices of the empire were located. In 879 B.C. Ashurnasirpal held a festival for 69,574 people to celebrate the construction of the new capital, and the event was documented by an inscription that read: “…the happy people of all the lands together with the people of Kalhu—for ten days I feasted, wined, bathed, and honored them and sent them back to their home in peace and joy.”

The so-called Standard Inscription that ran across the surface of most of the reliefs described Ashurnasirpal’s palace: “I built thereon [a palace with] halls of cedar, cypress, juniper, boxwood, teak, terebinth, and tamarisk [?] as my royal dwelling and for the enduring leisure life of my lordship.” The inscription continues: “Beasts of the mountains and the seas, which I had fashioned out of white limestone and alabaster, I had set up in its gates. I made it [the palace] fittingly imposing.” Such limestone beasts are the human-headed, winged bull and lion pictured here. The horned cap attests to their divinity, and the belt signifies their power. The sculptor gave these guardian figures five legs so that they appear to be standing firmly when viewed from the front but striding forward when seen from the side. These lamassu protected and supported important doorways in Assyrian palaces.

All info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Photo by Brass Ivy Design.


Hatshepsut as a maned sphinx

New KingdomDynasty 18Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose IIIca. 1479–1458 B.C.Egypt, Upper Egypt; Thebes, Deir el-Bahri, Senenmut Quarry, MMALimestone
The  reconstructed sections of this sphinx have been cast from an almost  identical, but more complete companion piece now in Cairo. The two small  limestone sphinxes may have been on either side of the entrance to the  upper terrace of Hatshepsut’s mortuary temple at Deir el-Bahri. The head  of this sphinx differs markedly from Hatshepsut’s large sphinxes in  which the human head wears the royal nemes-headcloth (see 31.3.166 and  31.3.167). Instead, this example was fashioned according to a type of  sphinx conceived some three centuries earlier in the Middle Kingdom  during the reign of Amenemhat III (ca. 1859-1813 B.C.). In this sphinx,  the only human element is the face which is surrounded by a lion’s mane.  Remains of pigment show that the face was painted yellow, the color  used for women in Egyptian Art.
All info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Photo by Brass Ivy Design

Hatshepsut as a maned sphinx

New Kingdom
Dynasty 18
Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III
ca. 1479–1458 B.C.
Egypt, Upper Egypt; Thebes, Deir el-Bahri, Senenmut Quarry, MMA
Limestone

The reconstructed sections of this sphinx have been cast from an almost identical, but more complete companion piece now in Cairo. The two small limestone sphinxes may have been on either side of the entrance to the upper terrace of Hatshepsut’s mortuary temple at Deir el-Bahri. The head of this sphinx differs markedly from Hatshepsut’s large sphinxes in which the human head wears the royal nemes-headcloth (see 31.3.166 and 31.3.167). Instead, this example was fashioned according to a type of sphinx conceived some three centuries earlier in the Middle Kingdom during the reign of Amenemhat III (ca. 1859-1813 B.C.). In this sphinx, the only human element is the face which is surrounded by a lion’s mane. Remains of pigment show that the face was painted yellow, the color used for women in Egyptian Art.

All info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Photo by Brass Ivy Design

Amenemhat II
A giant 4,000-year-old Egyptian visitor looms over the crowd of live humans milling antlike throughout the vast entry hall of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. He is an extraordinary specimen of regal manhood. Carved from a single block of dark gray granodiorite, he sits in a form-fitting kilt on a cubic throne covered by hieroglyphics. He has the broad shoulders, narrow waist and muscular legs of a well-developed athlete. Sporting a headdress of folded striped fabric, he gazes out over the masses with imperturbable self-assurance and open eyes set in a round, youthful face. He is as thrilling as anything in the Met’s great Egyptian collection.Blurb from the NY Times: www.nytimes.com/2011/08/23/arts/design/amenemhat-ii-at-metropolitan-museum-review.html
Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Amenemhat II

A giant 4,000-year-old Egyptian visitor looms over the crowd of live humans milling antlike throughout the vast entry hall of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. He is an extraordinary specimen of regal manhood. Carved from a single block of dark gray granodiorite, he sits in a form-fitting kilt on a cubic throne covered by hieroglyphics. He has the broad shoulders, narrow waist and muscular legs of a well-developed athlete. Sporting a headdress of folded striped fabric, he gazes out over the masses with imperturbable self-assurance and open eyes set in a round, youthful face. He is as thrilling as anything in the Met’s great Egyptian collection.

Blurb from the NY Times: www.nytimes.com/2011/08/23/arts/design/amenemhat-ii-at-metropolitan-museum-review.html

Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object from the Metropolitan Museum of Art


Ceremonial Sword

Yataghan from the court of Suleyman the MagnificentWorkshop of Ahmed Tekelü  (Iranian (?), active in Istanbul, ca. 1520–1530)
ca. 1525Turkish (Istanbul)Steel, walrus ivory, gold, silver, rubies, turquoise,and pearls
Exquisite  workmanship and lavish use of precious materials distinguish this sword  as a princely weapon and exemplifies the opulence and refinement of  Ottoman luxury arts. Almost identical to a yatagan (now in the Topkapi  Palace, Istanbul) made in 1526–27 by the court jeweler Ahmed Tekel, for  the Ottoman sultan Süleyman the Magnificent (r. 1520–66), this sword was  undoubtedly made in the same imperial workshop. The gold incrustation  on the blade depicts a combat between a dragon and a phoenix against a  background of foliate scrolls. These figures, like the gold-inlaid cloud  bands and foliate scrolls on the ivory grips, are Chinese in  inspiration, and were probably introduced into Ottoman art through  contacts with Persia.This sword is one of the earliest known  yatagans, distinctly Turkish weapons characterized by a double-curved  blade and a hilt without a guard. Yatagans were commonplace in Turkey  and the Balkans in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and served as  sidearms for the elite troops known as janissaries.
Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art
Sorry its been so long my loyal followers! Please accept this beautiful ceremonial sword as an apology. I just made another visit to the Metropolitan Museum, so I have all new content for this tumblr coming soon. Keep watching!

Ceremonial Sword

Yataghan from the court of Suleyman the Magnificent
Workshop of Ahmed Tekelü (Iranian (?), active in Istanbul, ca. 1520–1530)

ca. 1525
Turkish (Istanbul)
Steel, walrus ivory, gold, silver, rubies, turquoise,and pearls

Exquisite workmanship and lavish use of precious materials distinguish this sword as a princely weapon and exemplifies the opulence and refinement of Ottoman luxury arts. Almost identical to a yatagan (now in the Topkapi Palace, Istanbul) made in 1526–27 by the court jeweler Ahmed Tekel, for the Ottoman sultan Süleyman the Magnificent (r. 1520–66), this sword was undoubtedly made in the same imperial workshop. The gold incrustation on the blade depicts a combat between a dragon and a phoenix against a background of foliate scrolls. These figures, like the gold-inlaid cloud bands and foliate scrolls on the ivory grips, are Chinese in inspiration, and were probably introduced into Ottoman art through contacts with Persia.
This sword is one of the earliest known yatagans, distinctly Turkish weapons characterized by a double-curved blade and a hilt without a guard. Yatagans were commonplace in Turkey and the Balkans in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and served as sidearms for the elite troops known as janissaries.

Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Sorry its been so long my loyal followers! Please accept this beautiful ceremonial sword as an apology. I just made another visit to the Metropolitan Museum, so I have all new content for this tumblr coming soon. Keep watching!

Writing Palette and Brushes of Princess  Meketaten
Ivory, rush brushes, red, yellow, and black pigments ReedNew Kingdom, Amarna PeriodDynasty 18reign of Akhenatenca. 1353–1336 B.C.Egypt, Middle Egypt, el-Amarna (Akhetaten); inc. el-Hagg Qandil
The  existence of the palette suggests that the royal princesses were  educated in the scribal arts. The palette is inscribed for “the king’s  own beloved daughter, Meketaten, born of the chief wife  Nefernefruaten-Nefertiti, given life forever, eternally.” The last  phrase implies that the palette was a funerary gift for the princess,  who died during her father’s reign.

Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Writing Palette and Brushes of Princess Meketaten

Ivory, rush brushes, red, yellow, and black pigments Reed
New Kingdom, Amarna Period
Dynasty 18
reign of Akhenaten
ca. 1353–1336 B.C.
Egypt, Middle Egypt, el-Amarna (Akhetaten); inc. el-Hagg Qandil

The existence of the palette suggests that the royal princesses were educated in the scribal arts. The palette is inscribed for “the king’s own beloved daughter, Meketaten, born of the chief wife Nefernefruaten-Nefertiti, given life forever, eternally.” The last phrase implies that the palette was a funerary gift for the princess, who died during her father’s reign.

Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Large Kneeling Statue of Hatshepsut
New KingdomDynasty 18Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose IIIEgypt, Upper Egypt; Thebes, Deir el-Bahri, Hatshepsut Hole, Senenmut Quarry
Colossal statue of Pharaoh Hatshepsut presenting offerings while wearing the crown of Upper Egypt and a false beard.
Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Large Kneeling Statue of Hatshepsut

New Kingdom
Dynasty 18
Joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III
Egypt, Upper Egypt; Thebes, Deir el-Bahri, Hatshepsut Hole, Senenmut Quarry

Colossal statue of Pharaoh Hatshepsut presenting offerings while wearing the crown of Upper Egypt and a false beard.

Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

“Tell el-Jahudiyeh” Vase in the Shape  of a Duck
Middle Kingdom–Early New KingdomDynasty 13–17ca. 1700–1570 B.C.Egypt, Upper Egypt; ThebesPottery, smoke blackening, white gypsum
Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

“Tell el-Jahudiyeh” Vase in the Shape of a Duck

Middle Kingdom–Early New Kingdom
Dynasty 13–17
ca. 1700–1570 B.C.
Egypt, Upper Egypt; Thebes
Pottery, smoke blackening, white gypsum

Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Marble seated harp player
MarbleCycladiclate Early Cycladic I–Early Cycladic IIca. 2800–2700 B.C.
A  male figure sits on a high-backed chair playing a stringed instrument.  This work, one of the earliest of the small number of known  representations of musicians, is distinguished by the sensitive modeling  of the arms and hands.
Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Marble seated harp player

Marble
Cycladic
late Early Cycladic I–Early Cycladic II
ca. 2800–2700 B.C.

A male figure sits on a high-backed chair playing a stringed instrument. This work, one of the earliest of the small number of known representations of musicians, is distinguished by the sensitive modeling of the arms and hands.

Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Young gallant
Edo period (1615-1868)17th centuryJapanAlbum leaves; Ink and colors on paper
Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Young gallant

Edo period (1615-1868)
17th century
Japan
Album leaves; Ink and colors on paper

Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Flintlock Gun of Louis XIII, King of France
Steel, brass, silver, gold, wood, mother-of-pearlPierre Le Bourgeois (died 1627)French (Lisieux)ca. 1620
This  smoothbore hunting gun is one of the earliest firearms equipped with a  flintlock of French construction. It was made for Louis XIII of France  (r. 1610–43) in the workshop directed by Pierre Le Bourgeois’s brother  Marin (ca. 1550–1634), to whom the invention of the flintlock mechanism  is traditionally ascribed. The decoration of the gun includes the  crowned monogram of the king.
Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Flintlock Gun of Louis XIII, King of France

Steel, brass, silver, gold, wood, mother-of-pearl
Pierre Le Bourgeois (died 1627)
French (Lisieux)
ca. 1620

This smoothbore hunting gun is one of the earliest firearms equipped with a flintlock of French construction. It was made for Louis XIII of France (r. 1610–43) in the workshop directed by Pierre Le Bourgeois’s brother Marin (ca. 1550–1634), to whom the invention of the flintlock mechanism is traditionally ascribed. The decoration of the gun includes the crowned monogram of the king.

Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Judith
Jean-Joseph Benjamin-ConstantFrench 1845-1912Oil on Canvas
Finding a Judith painting is very exciting for me. Right up there with finding any sort of Aphrodite/Isis hybrid statue from Greco-Roman times.
Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Judith

Jean-Joseph Benjamin-Constant
French 1845-1912
Oil on Canvas

Finding a Judith painting is very exciting for me. Right up there with finding any sort of Aphrodite/Isis hybrid statue from Greco-Roman times.

Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Costume Armor in the Classical Style
Silk, cotton, metal coils and spangles, metallic yarnFrench18th century, about 1780
Pageants  in pseudo-classical dress were popular in Europe from the 16th through  18th century. An elaborate costume of the kind displayed here may have  been worn for a theatrical performance or a court festivity, such as a  ball or carousel in which the theme was taken from classical mythology  or history.
The embroidered tunic represents an embossed bronze cuirass of the type worn by high-ranking Roman officers.
Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Costume Armor in the Classical Style

Silk, cotton, metal coils and spangles, metallic yarn
French
18th century, about 1780

Pageants in pseudo-classical dress were popular in Europe from the 16th through 18th century. An elaborate costume of the kind displayed here may have been worn for a theatrical performance or a court festivity, such as a ball or carousel in which the theme was taken from classical mythology or history.

The embroidered tunic represents an embossed bronze cuirass of the type worn by high-ranking Roman officers.

Photo by Brass Ivy Design, object and info from the Metropolitan Museum of Art